You are here:

Skiing on identity: how SKIMS × The North Face created a collaboration that makes sense

Collaborations between brands are everywhere these days. They often feel fleeting or strategically calculated: two names side by side, lots of visibility, little depth. Occasionally, however, a collaboration emerges that goes beyond reach alone: a collaboration that says something about positioning, timing and brand identity.

The SKIMS × The North Face winter collection is one such moment. Not because two big brands found each other, but because their collaboration shows how different worlds can reinforce each other without losing their own character. While SKIMS is known for its minimalist, body-focused aesthetic, The North Face brings decades of experience in performance and outdoor protection to the table. The result is not a compromise, but a collection that combines functional skiwear with a distinct lifestyle look.

What makes this collaboration interesting from a marketing perspective is that both brands remained visibly true to their own DNA. The North Face continued to stand for protection against extreme conditions and technical reliability. SKIMS stuck to its recognisable aesthetic: sleek, modern and style-conscious. Instead of distorting each other, the brands reinforced each other's story.

It is precisely this balance that makes the collaboration credible. SKIMS is not trying to become an outdoor brand, and The North Face is not suddenly turning into a fashion label. As a result, the collaboration feels logical rather than forced, as if both brands complement each other rather than taking over. This shows that a collaboration is not about stretching identity, but about keeping it sharp.

The collection had a major impact, and not just in terms of sales figures. The rapid sell-out underlined its commercial success, but just as interesting was the shift in brand perception. The North Face became more visible in fashion and lifestyle circles, while SKIMS took a step towards functional clothing and performance. Without rebranding, without changing course; just through context.

The presentation of the collaboration also played a crucial role in this. The campaign images were sleek, modern and editorial. No excessive logos or flashy branding, but calm visuals in which luxury and functionality coexisted. This made the collection feel aspirational, but not unattainable. The product was sold not only for what it is, but for what it represents.

Ultimately, this ski collaboration is a strong example of contemporary marketing. Not because it was the biggest campaign, but because timing, brand fit, visual identity and cultural relevance coincided. The strength lay not in communicating louder, but in better coordination.

Not shouting louder, but collaborating smarter.